The period during which a business unit or company is divested is fraught with risk for both parties to the transaction.
One means of managing this risk is the Transition Service Agreement (TSA), a legal document that provides buyers and sellers with a framework for the period between closing the deal and separating the businesses.
DealRoom helps thousands of firms streamline processes for divestiture transactions, and in this article, we look at TSAs and their role in divestitures.
What is Transition Service Agreement?
A Transition Service Agreement (TSA) is an agreement between buyer and seller companies (or divested entities) in which one entity provides services and support (e.g., IT, finance, HR, real estate, payroll) to another after a divestiture to ensure business continuity. TSAs have become increasingly popular as companies’ technology stacks become larger, making disentangling business units far more complex than it once was.

Understanding Transition Service Agreements
Divestitures are rarely a matter of identifying an underperforming asset, division, or subsidiary and deciding to sell it.
More often than not, each of these is far more integrated in the seller’s business than they’re aware. Several divisions are likely to share the same information technology, head office functions, and distribution. Customer contracts are also likely to be affected. Effectively carving out what needs to be sold can be complex and time-consuming.
Negotiating this complexity begins during the due diligence phase, when companies determine the milestones that need to be negotiated to ensure a smooth transition of ownership. Once these have been drawn up, they can be articulated in the Transition Service Agreement (TSA).
The TSA is a contract, usually involving consideration, that outlines support services the seller agrees to provide to the buyer for a defined period after the transaction closes.
Once the broad terms of the TSA have been agreed upon between the seller and buyer, estimates are made of the deadlines, costs, and cost drivers for fulfilling each task outlined therein.
Both sides need to be realistic here. Overly ambitious TSAs can create more problems than they solve. Both sides then need to engage fully with the process: a successfully managed transition period can generate value for both parties.
Forward vs. Reverse TSA
A distinction is sometimes made between a forward and a reverse TSA; a forward TSA covers the provision of services from seller to buyer.
A reverse TSA, on the contrary, covers the provision of services from the buyer to the seller.
Although forward TSAs are far more common, anecdotal evidence suggests that reverse TSAs are also on the increase.
When a TSA is Needed

TSAs are most commonly used when it’s not possible to fully separate the parties' businesses at closing. They’re used to maintain the status quo during the transition period until the buyer is ready to run the business independently.
The most common scenario is a carve-out situation. A carve-out is when a business unit is being sold from a larger parent company.
Often in these situations, the seller will continue to provide certain services to the business being carved out for a limited period after closing, until the new, standalone company can operate on its own. Those services are usually operational support functions, such as HR, IT, accounting, and payroll. The carved-out company often doesn’t have its own infrastructure or standalone systems in place yet, so the TSA is used to maintain business continuity until it does.
TSAs are also frequently used in regulatory spin-offs, where licenses or regulatory approvals can’t be transferred to the buyer until after closing. In those situations, the TSA can be used to require the seller to continue hosting any necessary processes or systems until the buyer secures the required licenses and approvals.
TSAs are also used in private equity exits, where a fund sells a portfolio company that may need to rely on the seller’s shared services for a few months after closing, most commonly for support functions such as ERP systems, data migration, or cybersecurity.
Typical TSA Services and Duration
Transition service agreements usually cover core business functions that support day-to-day operations. Common examples include:
- IT services, such as network access, email, security monitoring, software licenses, and data hosting/migration.
- Finance and accounting activities like accounts payable/receivable, payroll, general ledger, and reporting.
- Human resources operations, including benefits administration, recruiting systems, and employee records.
- Procurement functions like supplier management, purchasing systems, and contract administration.
- Facilities and logistics, including building access, shared office space, security, and mailroom services.
- Legal and compliance support for ongoing litigation, intellectual property, and regulatory reporting.
The duration of a TSA depends on the complexity of the separation. Standalone IT or HR support may only be required for three to six months.
More complex or integrated business operations may require a TSA period of nine to twelve months or more, such as shared ERP systems, supply chains, or cross-border legal and compliance functions.
Effective TSAs are as short as is reasonably possible. The longer the buyer is dependent on the seller’s infrastructure and operations, the higher the risk of delays, additional costs, and blurred responsibility. For this reason, both parties typically agree to an exit roadmap with defined milestones and handover deadlines upfront.
The table below breaks down the typical service areas included in TSAs and their typical durations.
Benefits of Transition Service Agreements
.webp)
The benefits of transition service agreements are as follows:
- Smoother transition: TSAs ensure that the small details of transactions, which may once have been overlooked, receive the attention they deserve. This, in turn, leads to smoother transactions.
- Define what is being sold: Business units cannot be sold with ‘one leg in and one leg out.’ It has to be all or nothing. TSAs help managers focus on this concept by highlighting issues that could later destroy value if left unaddressed.
- Value generation: The clarity provided by TSAs generates value for both parties to the transaction. Ultimately, both sides want to return to operations as quickly as possible after the transaction, and a TSA facilitates this.
- Reduced risk: As outlined at the beginning of this article, reducing risk is one of the principal aims of TSAs. Ensuring that small details don’t become big ones reduces risk on both sides of the transaction.
Key Considerations for Drafting an Effective TSA

Among the issues that need to be considered when drafting a TSA include:
- Envision an end state: The seller (or buyer) should consider what the company's end state should be after the transition period wraps up. This will help when setting goals within the TSA.
- Budget accordingly: Remember that almost everything is a cost to the business to some extent—office space, executive time, and even casual Zoom calls between buyer and seller. Ensure that these are accounted for at the outset.
- Ensure contract clarity: ‘Project creep’—the risk of projects moving outside their original scope—dogs many TSAs. By ensuring clarity in the TSA, this can be avoided, and deadlines are more likely to be met.
Collaborate: Whether you’re on the buy or sell side, work with the other side. Everyone stands to create value from the TSA. Collaborating also enables the process to wrap up more efficiently.

TSA M&A Playbook/Template
When drafting a TSA playbook, our M&A Academy at M&A Science has already provided resources for companies going through a divestiture process and in need of TSA.
In summary:
- Define what services would be required to manage business continuity from day one.
- Check if the scope of services is appropriate.
- Define measurables and auditable service levels.
- Define the duration of services.
- Check for regulatory and compliance issues.
- Confirm for potential contractual issues with IT vendors.
- Prepare indicative costing of TSA services.
- Outline how governance would work post-close.
Get Your TSA Template Here.
Structure and Key Elements of TSAs

“No two carve-outs are alike. Templates are maybe 80% right—there’s always 20% white space you have to figure out.”
- Keith Crawford
Shared at The Buyer-Led M&A™ Summit (watch the entire summit for free here)
TSA Governance and Exit Strategy

In addition to the services that will be provided, transition service agreements should also outline how those services will be managed and eventually discontinued. Governance is the key to preventing a TSA that remains an open-ended drain on resources.
Typically, a bilateral steering committee is formed with members from both the buyer and seller sides. This committee monitors performance, reviews progress toward exit milestones, and manages disputes before they escalate.
Scheduled check-ins, whether weekly in the early stages and then bi-weekly or monthly, can ensure both sides stay aligned as services are brought to a close.
For every service line included in the TSA, service-level agreements (SLAs) and key performance indicators (KPIs) should be clearly defined, outlining the quality, timing, and scope of service delivery, including IT response times, payroll processing accuracy, and specific deadlines for monthly reports. These benchmarks allow both parties to objectively measure performance against agreed-upon criteria and create a basis for accountability.
Day one of a TSA should also include a well-thought-out exit strategy. The TSA should clearly mark transition milestones, such as the completion of data migration or an ERP system cutover, and assign owners to each. Tracking and reporting progress toward these milestones in governance meetings ensures a clear glide path to independence.
One of the biggest risks with TSAs is falling into the dreaded “extension trap.” If a buyer is not ready with their systems or resources, TSA terms may be extended in succession, tying up personnel and adding costs for the seller. To prevent this, both sides need to treat the TSA as a project with an end date in mind, with fees that increase the longer the TSA is extended or with step-down service levels to incentivize completion.
With strong governance, transparent reporting, and a disciplined approach to the exit strategy, TSAs should never become long-term entanglements but rather serve as a bridge to stability without hindering post-deal growth.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary purpose of a Transition Service Agreement (TSA)?
The primary purpose of a TSA is to ensure business continuity and manage risk during the complex period after a divestiture. It allows the buyer to continue receiving essential services (like IT, HR, and Finance) from the seller for a limited time, giving the buyer time to establish its own standalone operations without disrupting daily business activities.
How long does a typical TSA last?
The duration of a TSA varies significantly based on the complexity of the separation. Typically, TSAs last from 3 to 12 months. Simpler services (such as payroll or facilities access) may require only 3 to 6 months, while more complex, integrated systems (such as a shared ERP or legal/compliance support) may require 9 to 12 months or more. The goal is always to make the TSA as short as possible to avoid prolonged dependency.
What happens if the TSA period ends before the buyer is ready?
This is a significant risk. If the buyer isn't ready, they must formally request an extension from the seller. Extensions are often negotiated at a premium price to incentivize the buyer to become independent. The original TSA should clearly outline the process and potential cost penalties for extensions to discourage this scenario.
Who pays for the services in a TSA, and how is it priced?
The buyer typically pays the seller for the services outlined in the TSA. Pricing is usually structured as:
- Cost-Plus: The seller's direct cost plus an agreed-upon markup (e.g., 5-15%) to cover overhead and provide a small profit.
- Market Rate: A fee comparable to what a third-party vendor would charge.
The specific pricing mechanism and all costs are negotiated and detailed in the TSA agreement to avoid disputes.
Key Takeaways
- A transition service agreement ensures business continuity after a divestiture by defining temporary support services (e.g., IT, HR, finance) that the seller provides to the buyer.
- TSAs are critical when immediate separation isn’t possible, helping manage operational risk and maintain stability during the transition period.
- A well-structured TSA with clear governance, timelines, and exit strategies prevents costly extensions and enables a smooth, value-creating handover.
All companies going through the divestiture process should make a transition service agreement a central part of the process.
As well as focusing managers and their employees on the gray areas likely to pose problems in the sale, a well-drafted TSA can also generate considerable value for both buyer and seller.
Talk to DealRoom today about our expertise in TSAs and how they facilitate better divestitures.










.webp)
.webp)
.webp)



.webp)
.webp)
.webp)

.png)
