.avif)
In M&A, cash-free debt-free means the buyer values the business as if it carried no cash and no debt. The seller keeps the surplus cash on the balance sheet and clears the borrowings before completion, so the agreed enterprise value is the starting point rather than the final cheque.
Four things move between that enterprise value and the money the seller actually receives: cash, debt, debt-like items and the working capital adjustment. The equity price is enterprise value plus cash, minus debt, minus debt-like items, plus or minus the working capital true-up against an agreed target. In private-target M&A those working capital adjustments now appear in more than 90% of transactions, up from 50% a decade ago, according to SRS Acquiom’s 2026 study. The alternative mechanism is a locked box, where the price is fixed at an earlier balance sheet date and there is no completion true-up at all.
I spent over a decade as an M&A advisor before building diligence software. Most CFDF arguments are not about the structure. They are about which items count as cash-like and which count as debt-like, because every item either side reclassifies moves real money. This guide covers both lists, the equity bridge and the traps that surface at completion.
The Cash-Free Debt-Free Rationale
The main rationale for cash-free debt-free deals is that the buyer wants to acquire a company and its future cash flows.
It wants to avoid the excess ‘baggage’ that comes with acquiring anything outside of these parameters.
For example, take cases where the company has undertaken complex debt agreements, in which the shareholders of the business have used personal collateral to guarantee the debt.
This, along with any other covenants which were made at the time of the loan, would have to be reorganized if an acquirer of the business took on the debt.
On the cash side, the name cash-free is something of a misnomer (more of which below). What’s actually happening is the firm is being acquired without any excess cash.
In practice, this means that the cash value on the balance sheet is often added to the acquisition price to compensate the buyer for it, effectively allowing them to ‘take it from the balance sheet.’
This is just one of the many technicalities of cash-free debt-free which means the expression shouldn’t be taken too literally.
Which brings us to...
Defining Cash Items
What is cash?
At first glance, the answer may appear obvious, but recall that a standard item which appears on the assets section of any balance sheet is ‘cash equivalents’, and the line between working capital and cash is also quite blurred.
It is therefore not unusual for there to be some back-and-forth over what counts as cash in an M&A transaction, giving rise to ‘cash-like’ assets.
Cash in this context comes down to what the buyer and seller agrees constitutes working capital - the amount of cash that allows the company to change hands without any need for accessing a credit facility (i.e. enough to “carry operations”).
The buyer will understandably push for more cash here, for insurance purposes as much as anything else, while the seller will inevitably want to obtain as much cash from the transaction as possible and play down the working capital requirements.
Defining Debt Items
The definition of debt can be similarly difficult to pin down, which is where we run into the notion of debt-like items: strictly speaking, these aren’t debt (i.e. they’re not loans owed to a third party) but they do have all of the characteristics of debt - the company will have to pay them, just as if they were a loan.
Most of these debt-like items are liabilities and constitute a second area of potential dispute between the buyer and seller.
For example, nobody can forecast with certainty the pension liability of a defined benefits pension plan.
Thus, the seller looks to talk down the size of the liability, while the buyer, knowing that he or she will have to pay the future pension liabilities will play them up.
Other areas where a dispute may arise regarding debt-like liabilities include warranty claims, accrued employee bonuses (something which even otherwise excellent due diligence processes tend to overlook), a letter of credit, pending legal settlements and tax liabilities.
It’s not difficult to see how a process whose aim was ostensibly to simplify the transaction can quickly become quite complex, but most of these issues are relatively minor for the most SMEs.
A worked example: from enterprise value to the cheque
A buyer and a seller agree an enterprise value of $10 million on a cash-free debt-free basis. Here is what happens between that number and the money that reaches the seller’s account. Deal teams call this calculation the CFDF bridge, or the equity bridge.
At completion the business holds $750,000 of cash and carries $2 million of bank debt and finance leases. Financial due diligence identifies a $400,000 defined-benefit pension deficit and $120,000 of accrued employee bonuses, both of which the buyer classifies as debt-like. Working capital lands $150,000 below the agreed target.
The seller agreed a $10 million business and receives $8.08 million. Of the $1.92 million difference, $1.25 million is simply cash netted against debt, which both sides had priced when they shook hands. The other $670,000 was not on the debt line of the balance sheet at all. It is $520,000 of debt-like items that diligence surfaced and a $150,000 working capital true-up settled after closing.
That second figure is the one worth attention. Neither party modelled it at handshake, and both numbers were determined by definitions written into the sale agreement rather than by anything on the face of the accounts. Working capital adjustments are now present in more than 90% of private-target transactions, up from 50% a decade ago, according to SRS Acquiom’s 2026 study, so the true-up is no longer an edge case to plan around. It is the norm.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a pension deficit a debt-like item?
Yes, in most deals. A defined-benefit pension deficit is a funding obligation the business owes and will have to settle in cash, so buyers almost always treat it as debt-like and deduct it from the equity price. The arguments are usually about size rather than principle: which actuarial basis to use, whether to take the accounting deficit or the trustees’ funding valuation and whether to discount an agreed recovery plan back to present value. Defined-contribution schemes are different. The employer obligation ends when the contribution is paid, so only unpaid contributions at completion are debt-like.
Is deferred revenue or a customer deposit a debt-like item?
This is one of the most contested classifications in a cash-free debt-free deal. Buyers argue that deferred revenue is debt-like, because the cash has already been collected and the buyer inherits the obligation to deliver the service without receiving anything further for it. Sellers argue it is working capital, because it arises from ordinary trading and is already captured in the working capital target. Both positions are defensible. What matters is that the sale agreement says which one applies, because the same balance cannot sit in the debt-like schedule and the working capital calculation at the same time.
What happens if working capital comes in above or below the target at completion?
The price moves pound for pound. If actual working capital at completion is above the agreed target, the buyer pays the seller the difference, because the buyer is receiving more receivables and stock than the deal assumed. If it comes in below the target, the price is reduced by the shortfall. The target is normally set as an average of the last twelve months so that it reflects a normal trading position rather than a seasonal high or low. Completion accounts are prepared after closing, usually within sixty to ninety days, and the adjustment is settled then.
Who decides whether an item counts as cash or debt-like?
The sale agreement decides, not accounting standards. Cash-free debt-free is a commercial convention rather than a defined accounting treatment, so the definitions of cash, debt and debt-like items are negotiated and written into the agreement as schedules. Financial due diligence produces the candidate list, the lawyers turn it into definitions and anything left ambiguous becomes an argument during completion accounts. Most agreements also name an independent accountant as expert to determine disputed items, whose decision binds both parties.
What is the difference between cash-free debt-free and a locked box?
They settle the price at different moments. Under cash-free debt-free with completion accounts, cash, debt and working capital are measured on the closing date and the price is trued up afterwards, so the final figure is not known on the day the deal signs. Under a locked box, the price is fixed against a balance sheet dated before signing, the seller gives covenants against leakage between that date and closing and there is no completion adjustment. Locked boxes give certainty and a faster close. Completion accounts give the buyer protection against the business deteriorating between signing and closing.
Does cash-free debt-free mean the seller keeps all the cash in the business?
Not all of it. The seller keeps surplus cash, which is cash above the level the business needs to keep operating. Trapped cash, restricted cash and the operating float usually stay in the business and are excluded from the cash figure added to the price. A buyer who takes on a business stripped of every last pound of working cash has to fund it again on day one, which is why the definition of surplus cash gets negotiated alongside the working capital target rather than separately from it.
How is the equity price calculated in a cash-free debt-free deal?
Start with the enterprise value, add cash, subtract debt, subtract debt-like items, then apply the working capital adjustment. Written out: equity price equals enterprise value plus cash, minus total debt, minus debt-like items, plus or minus the difference between actual working capital and the agreed target. Enterprise value is what the parties agree the business is worth on a cash-free debt-free basis. Every other line moves money between buyer and seller from that starting point, which is why the definitions behind each line are worth more attention than the headline number.
Key Takeaways
As this article has outlined, cash-free debt-free sounds straightforward but quickly runs into complexities and different interpretations.
Depending on how many day-to-day business transactions the selling company has in a typical quarter, the due diligence for cash-free debt-free can become extremely time-consuming.
However, assuming goodwill on the part of both sides and a willingness to get the deal done, cash-free debt-free can become a formality.
The Letter of Intent (LOI) for the transaction can even be drafted to cater for any unexpected cash-like or debt-like items that didn’t show up in CFDF.
Both sides then find a middle ground that they’re satisfied with and one that reflects a fair value for the company being acquired.
.png){kind=small}
.avif)
